| Sign In | Join Free | My burrillandco.com |
|
| Ask Lasest Price | |
| Model Number : | 1-cf-7 |
| Payment Terms : | T/T |
| Certification : | ISO9001 |
| Price : | $1200-$1580 |
| Delivery Time : | 7-14days |
| Brand Name : | Jovi |
| Supply Ability : | 300 Set / Month |
Hospital purchasing departments often choose lower‑priced brass or stainless steel “non‑magnetic” tools. However, five hidden costs emerge within 12–24 months:
| Hidden Cost | Brass / Stainless Consequence | Jovvi Titanium Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Artifact repeat scans | 3–5 extra scans/year due to tool‑induced artifacts | Zero artifact incidents |
| Tool replacement | Brass strips (6 months); Stainless becomes magnetic (12 months) | 10+ year service life |
| Patient schedule disruption | 1–2 hours lost per artifact incident | No disruption |
| Cryostat contamination risk | Ferromagnetic particle ingress → quench ($50k–200k) | Eliminated |
| Staff time for tool demagnetization | 30 min/week (stainless tools) | Not required |
Jovvi quality guarantee: ≥90% titanium composition verified by XRF spectrometer on every production batch.
Current tool set: Mixed brass and 316 stainless
Annual artifact incidents: 12 reported (field distortion visible on images)
Cost per incident: $500 (radiologist review + patient recall + 30 min scanner downtime)
Annual hidden cost: 12 × $500 = $6,000
Jovvi solution: One ProKit‑2 ($1,800) + One ProKit‑1 ($1,200) = $3,000 total
ROI: 6 months (savings of $3,000 in first year after tool purchase)
Current tool set: Non‑magnetic stainless (claims “MR Conditional”)
Issue: Even 300 series stainless causes 5–10 mm artifacts at 7T – unacceptable for small animal brain imaging (voxel size 0.2 mm)
Annual research grant loss: 2 rejected papers due to artifact suspicion → $50,000 in lost publication value
Jovvi solution: ProKit‑3 ($2,500)
ROI: 3 months (prevents grant loss)
Current practice: Field engineers bring their own steel tools, leaving ferromagnetic debris inside scanner room
Risk: Accumulated debris causes gradual image quality degradation
|